What's next for the tax increase?
by CAITLIN MULLEN
2 months ago | 379 views | 6 6 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
ASHLEY GARNER/The Sanford Herald
Jenny Barrow votes Tuesday at Southern Lee High School. She was one of the 3,799 county residents who cast a ballot for or against the sales tax referendum to renovate the county’s other high school, Lee County High School. The referendum passed overwhelmingly.
ASHLEY GARNER/The Sanford Herald Jenny Barrow votes Tuesday at Southern Lee High School. She was one of the 3,799 county residents who cast a ballot for or against the sales tax referendum to renovate the county’s other high school, Lee County High School. The referendum passed overwhelmingly.
slideshow
SANFORD — On Tuesday, 3,799 county residents voted to increase the county sales tax by one-quarter of a penny to generate money for the nearly $20 million renovation of Lee County High School.

But the increase doesn’t take effect until the county board acts.

Administrators said they were pleased to have the community’s support for the referendum on the ballot Tuesday. Lee County High School Principal Greg Batten said Wednesday that excitement is in the air at the school.

“This is long overdue. Our staff and students deserve a modern, 21st century facility,” he said. “It’s nice that our kids our going to be on a level playing field” with other schools in the area.

Now the county will get things rolling. County Manager John Crumpton said that in order to receive revenues from January 2010, the first possible month the tax could be levied, the vote would have to come no later than Nov. 30. Since the board's next meeting is scheduled for Dec. 7, a special meeting will likely be called to meet this deadline.

Crumpton said the county would begin receiving revenues from the tax on April 1, 2010 — which would be from January sales, since dispersements lag a quarter-year behind. The tax increase will apply to non-essential items, so groceries, gas, utilities and prescription drugs are exempt.

On the school’s side of things, Superintendent Jeff Moss said plans should be designed and developed by late December or early January. From there, the plans will have to be approved at different levels, including by the division of school planning and by county and city inspectors, Moss said.

The project should go out for bid in February and be accepted in March, with construction beginning in April, he said.

But because the board decided last month to go ahead with the project regardless of the fate of the referendum, the county is already moving forward with the renovations, Crumpton said. When architect Jimmy Hite of Hite and Associates alerts the board that his plans are 30-60 days from the start of construction, the county will begin the bidding process.

The board will have to approve a resolution to authorize the county to borrow the funds — estimated at $19.5 million — to renovate the campus. Crumpton said he expects the county's accounting firm — Davenport, Marvin, Joyce & Co. — to present borrowing options to the board at its Dec. 7 meeting.

Moss and Board of Education member Frank Thompson, Sr. both said they are glad the school received such support.

“The commissioners took a stand and that’s all that was needed,” Thompson said. “Nobody will ever notice that quarter-cent sales tax.”

Batten said he understands it’s hard to be in favor of a tax increase, but felt the cause was necessary.

“No one likes increased taxes but there are certain things that truly are an investment in our future,” he said, “and our community can reap the benefits.”

Alison Poole, teacher and career development coordinator at the high school, said students and staff are ready to get started.

“I think the kids are going to be thrilled to have the new facility,” Poole said. “This is a huge deal. It’s time.”

o

Community Editor Jonathan Owens contributed to this story.
comments (6)
« Townsend wrote on Friday, Nov 06 at 06:07 PM »
County Resident Too: I never claimed that City kids were different from County kids or that City taxpayers did not pay County taxes on top of their City taxes. Spin me as a villain if you must, what I said was that “I don't know if true, but I have heard claims that City kids make up more of the LCHS population than County kids” I still have not found information on attendance zones, but will concede that does not make any difference since the precincts that can be identified as City gave only slightly LESS support (64.9 % for) to the sales tax increase than the County as a whole (66.5%)

To you the issue may be supporting the schools, to me the issue is holding the line on taxes and having the politicians live up to their promises. As the Pro side has pointed out the sales tax is minor compared to having the BOE going off half cocked with their improvement plan.

« County Resident Too wrote on Thursday, Nov 05 at 06:49 AM »
Townsend... City Kids are County Kids. City residents pay County property taxes just like you. Let's not make this a county vs. city issue because it's simply not. This is an issue about what is in the best interest of are youth and the impact that they will have on people's lives in the future. Hopefully, they will choose to live and work in Lee County when they graduate from high school or college. If not, that is OK; we can be satisifed that we provided the best environment we could to nurture the seeds of our country's future, and we are a better community for it.
« Thinking Man wrote on Thursday, Nov 05 at 06:45 AM »
Now that it has passed I sincerely hope Townsend, myself, and others are wrong about what we have said!! Only time will tell, but what happens if we are right? The voters once again have given permission to politicians to just raise taxes when they need money. This tax was passed, but what will people say or do if the this tax is not enough. Will they be OK with raising property taxes as well, all because it is for a good cause?
« John Galt wrote on Thursday, Nov 05 at 05:02 AM »
Harnett County was only projecting $1,000,000 per year from this sales tax increase, yet Lee County is projecting to generate 30% more, from the same amount of retail sales. Time will tell, Townsend may be right.
« Townsend wrote on Wednesday, Nov 04 at 11:18 PM »
just a parent, That isn't the only reason it passed this time. The rather sneaky tatic of puting the issue on the off year ballot when us county taxpayers had had no other reason to go to the polls likely reduced the number who voted on the issue. I don't know if true, but I have heard claims that City kids make up more of the LCHS population than County kids. Anybody that can do math realizes that property taxes will also be raised.
« just a parent wrote on Wednesday, Nov 04 at 08:52 PM »
The only reason that this tax passed is because the property owners were told that their property taxes would increase, if it didnt pass.